329 lines
14 KiB
Text
329 lines
14 KiB
Text
[[_fine_grain_permissions]]
|
|
|
|
=== Fine Grain Admin Permissions
|
|
|
|
:tech_feature_name: Fine Grain Admin Permissions
|
|
include::../templates/techpreview.adoc[]
|
|
|
|
Sometimes roles like `manage-realm` or `manage-users` are too coarse grain and you want to create
|
|
restricted admin accounts that have more fine grain permissions. {project_name} allows you to define
|
|
and assign restricted access policies for managing a realm. Things like:
|
|
|
|
* Managing one specific client
|
|
* Managing users that belong to a specific group
|
|
* Managing membership of a group
|
|
* Limited user management.
|
|
* Fine grain impersonization control
|
|
* Being able to assign a specific restricted set of roles to users.
|
|
* Being able to assign a specific restricted set of roles to a composite role.
|
|
* Being able to assign a specific restricted set of roles to a client's scope.
|
|
* New general policies for viewing and managing users, groups, roles, and clients.
|
|
|
|
There's some important things to note about fine grain admin permissions:
|
|
|
|
* Fine grain admin permissions were implemented on top of link:{authorizationguide_link}[Authorization Services]. It is highly recommended that you read up on those features before diving into fine grain permissions.
|
|
* Fine grain permissions are only available within <<_per_realm_admin_permissions, dedicated admin consoles>> and admins defined within those realms. You cannot define cross-realm fine grain permissions.
|
|
* Fine grain permissions are used to grant additional permissions. You cannot override the
|
|
default behavior of the built in admin roles.
|
|
|
|
==== Managing One Specific Client
|
|
|
|
Let's look first at allowing
|
|
an admin to manage one client and one client only. In our example we have a realm
|
|
called `test` and a client called `sales-application`. In realm `test` we will give a
|
|
user in that realm permission to only manage that application.
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT: You cannot do cross realm fine grain permissions. Admins in the `master` realm are limited to the predefined admin roles defined in previous chapters.
|
|
|
|
===== Permission Setup
|
|
|
|
The first thing we must do is login to the Admin Console so we can set up permissions for that client. We navigate to the management section
|
|
of the client we want to define fine-grain permissions for.
|
|
|
|
.Client Management
|
|
image:{project_images}/fine-grain-client.png[]
|
|
|
|
You should see a tab menu item called `Permissions`. Click on that tab.
|
|
|
|
.Client Permissions Tab
|
|
image:{project_images}/fine-grain-client-permissions-tab-off.png[]
|
|
|
|
By default, each client is not enabled to do fine grain permissions. So turn the `Permissions Enabled` switch to on
|
|
to initialize permissions.
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT: If you turn the `Permissions Enabled` switch to off, it will delete any and all permissions you have defined for this client.
|
|
|
|
.Client Permissions Tab
|
|
image:{project_images}/fine-grain-client-permissions-tab-on.png[]
|
|
|
|
When you witch `Permissions Enabled` to on, it initializes various permission objects behind the scenes
|
|
using link:{authorizationguide_link}[Authorization Services]. For this example, we're
|
|
interested in the `manage` permission for the client. Clicking on that will redirect you
|
|
to the permission that handles the `manage` permission for the client. All authorization
|
|
objects are contained in the `realm-management` client's `Authorization` tab.
|
|
|
|
.Client Manage Permission
|
|
image:{project_images}/fine-grain-client-manage-permissions.png[]
|
|
|
|
When first initialized the `manage` permission does not have any policies associated with it.
|
|
You will need to create one by going to the policy tab. To get there fast, click on
|
|
the `Authorization` link shown in the above image. Then click on the policies tab.
|
|
|
|
There's a pull down menu on this page called `Create policy`. There's a multitude of policies
|
|
you can define. You can define a policy that is associated with a role or a group or even define
|
|
rules in JavaScript. For this simple example, we're going to create a `User Policy`.
|
|
|
|
.User Policy
|
|
image:{project_images}/fine-grain-client-user-policy.png[]
|
|
|
|
This policy will match a hard-coded user in the user database. In this case it is the `sales-admin` user. We must then go back to the
|
|
`sales-application` client's `manage` permission page and assign the policy to the permission object.
|
|
|
|
.Assign User Policy
|
|
image:{project_images}/fine-grain-client-assign-user-policy.png[]
|
|
|
|
The `sales-admin` user can now has permission to manage the `sales-application` client.
|
|
|
|
There's one more thing we have to do. Go to the `Role Mappings` tab and assign the `query-clients`
|
|
role to the `sales-admin`.
|
|
|
|
.Assign query-clients
|
|
image:{project_images}/fine-grain-assign-query-clients.png[]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why do you have to do this? This role tells the Admin Console
|
|
what menu items to render when the `sales-admin` visits the Admin Console. The `query-clients`
|
|
role tells the Admin Console that it should render client menus for the `sales-admin` user.
|
|
|
|
IMPORTANT If you do not set the `query-clients` role, restricted admins like `sales-admin` will not see any menu options when they log into the Admin Console
|
|
|
|
===== Testing It Out.
|
|
|
|
Next we log out of the master realm and re-login to the <<_per_realm_admin_permissions, dedicated admin console>> for the `test` realm
|
|
using the `sales-admin` as a username. This is located under `/auth/admin/test/console`.
|
|
|
|
.Sales Admin Login
|
|
image:{project_images}/fine-grain-sales-admin-login.png[]
|
|
|
|
This admin is now able to manage this one client.
|
|
|
|
==== Restrict User Role Mapping
|
|
|
|
Another thing you might want to do is to restrict the set a roles an admin is allowed
|
|
to assign to a user. Continuing our last example, let's expand the permission set of the 'sales-admin'
|
|
user so that he can also control which users are allowed to access this application. Through fine grain permissions we can
|
|
enable it so that the `sales-admin` can only assign roles that grant specific access to
|
|
the `sales-application`. We can also restrict it so that the admin can only map roles
|
|
and not perform any other types of user administration.
|
|
|
|
The `sales-application` has defined three different client roles.
|
|
|
|
.Sales Application Roles
|
|
image:{project_images}/fine-grain-sales-application-roles.png[]
|
|
|
|
We want the `sales-admin` user to be able to map these roles to any user in the system. The
|
|
first step to do this is to allow the role to be mapped by the admin. If we click on the
|
|
`viewLeads` role, you'll see that there is a `Permissions` tab for this role.
|
|
|
|
.View Leads Role Permission Tab
|
|
image:{project_images}/fine-grain-view-leads-role-tab.png[]
|
|
|
|
If we click on that tab and turn the `Permissions Enabled` on, you'll see that there
|
|
are a number of actions we can apply policies to.
|
|
|
|
.View Leads Permissions
|
|
image:{project_images}/fine-grain-view-leads-permissions.png[]
|
|
|
|
The one we are interested in is `map-role`. Click on this permission and add the same
|
|
User Policy that was created in the earlier example.
|
|
|
|
.Map-roles Permission
|
|
image:{project_images}/fine-grain-map-roles-permission.png[]
|
|
|
|
What we've done is say that the `sales-admin` can map the `viewLeads` role. What we have
|
|
not done is specify which users the admin is allowed to map this role too. To do that
|
|
we must go to the `Users` section of the admin console for this realm. Clicking on the
|
|
`Users` left menu item brings us to the users interface of the realm. You should see a
|
|
`Permissions` tab. Click on that and enable it.
|
|
|
|
.Users Permissions
|
|
image:{project_images}/fine-grain-users-permissions.png[]
|
|
|
|
The permission we are interested in is `map-roles`. This is a restrictive policy
|
|
in that it only allows admins the ability to map roles to a user. If we click on the
|
|
`map-roles` permission and again add the User Policy we created for this, our `sales-admin`
|
|
will be able to map roles to any user.
|
|
|
|
The last thing we have to do is add the `view-users` role to the `sales-admin`. This will
|
|
allow the admin to view users in the realm he wants to add the `sales-application` roles to.
|
|
|
|
.Add view-users
|
|
image:{project_images}/fine-grain-add-view-users.png[]
|
|
|
|
|
|
===== Testing It Out.
|
|
|
|
Next we log out of the master realm and re-login to the <<_per_realm_admin_permissions, dedicated admin console>> for the `test` realm
|
|
using the `sales-admin` as a username. This is located under `/auth/admin/test/console`.
|
|
|
|
You will see that now the `sales-admin` can view users in the system. If you select one of the
|
|
users you'll see that each user detail page is read only, except for the `Role Mappings` tab.
|
|
Going to these tab you'll find that there are no `Available` roles for the admin to
|
|
map to the user except when we browse the `sales-application` roles.
|
|
|
|
.Add viewLeads
|
|
image:{project_images}/fine-grain-add-view-leads.png[]
|
|
|
|
We've only specified that the `sales-admin` can map the `viewLeads` role.
|
|
|
|
===== Per Client map-roles Shortcut
|
|
|
|
It would be tedious if we had to do this for every client role that the `sales-application` published.
|
|
to make things easier, there's a way to specify that an admin can map any role defined
|
|
by a client. If we log back into the admin console to our master realm admin and go back
|
|
to the `sales-application` permissions page, you'll see the `map-roles` permission.
|
|
|
|
.Client map-roles Permission
|
|
image:{project_images}/fine-grain-client-permissions-tab-on.png[]
|
|
|
|
If you grant access to this particular parmission to an admin, that admin will be able
|
|
map any role defined by the client.
|
|
|
|
==== Full List of Permissions
|
|
|
|
You can do a lot more with fine grain permissions beyond managing a specific client or the specific roles of a client.
|
|
This chapter defines the whole list of permission types that can be described for
|
|
a realm.
|
|
|
|
===== Role
|
|
|
|
When going to the `Permissions` tab for a specific role, you will see these
|
|
permission types listed.
|
|
|
|
map-role::
|
|
Policies that decide if an admin can map this role to a user. These policies
|
|
only specify that the role can be mapped to a user, not that the admin is allowed
|
|
to perform user role mapping tasks. The admin will also have to have manage or
|
|
role mapping permissions. See <<_users-permissions, Users Permissions>> for more information.
|
|
map-role-composite::
|
|
Policies that decide if an admin can map this role as a composite to another role.
|
|
An admin can define roles for a client if he has manage permissions for that client
|
|
but he will not be able to add composites to those roles unless he has the
|
|
`map-role-composite` privileges for the role he wants to add as a composite.
|
|
map-role-client-scope::
|
|
Policies that decide if an admin can apply this role to the scope of a client.
|
|
Even if the admin can manage the client, he will not have permission to
|
|
create tokens for that client that contain this role unless this privilege
|
|
is granted.
|
|
|
|
===== Client
|
|
|
|
When going to the `Permissions` tab for a specific client, you will see these
|
|
permission types listed.
|
|
|
|
view::
|
|
Policies that decide if an admin can view the client's configuration.
|
|
manage::
|
|
Policies that decide if an admin can view and manage the client's configuration.
|
|
There is some issues with this in that privileges could be leaked unintentionally.
|
|
For example, the admin could define a protocol mapper that hardcoded a role
|
|
even if the admin does not have privileges to map the role to the client's scope.
|
|
This is currently the limitation of protocol mappers as they don't have a way
|
|
to assign individual permissions to them like roles do.
|
|
configure::
|
|
Reduced set of prileges to manage the client. Its like the `manage` scope except
|
|
the admin is not allowed to define protocol mappers, change the client template,
|
|
or the client's scope.
|
|
map-roles::
|
|
Policies that decide if an admin can map any role defined by the client to a user.
|
|
This is a shortcut, easy-of-use feature to avoid having to defin policies
|
|
for each and every role defined by the client.
|
|
map-roles-composite::
|
|
Policies that decide if an admin can map any role defined by the client
|
|
as a composite to another role.
|
|
This is a shortcut, easy-of-use feature to avoid having to define policies
|
|
for each and every role defined by the client.
|
|
map-roles-client-scope::
|
|
Policies that decide if an admin can map any role defined by the client
|
|
to the scope of another client.
|
|
This is a shortcut, easy-of-use feature to avoid having to define policies
|
|
for each and every role defined by the client.
|
|
|
|
[[_users-permissions]]
|
|
===== Users
|
|
|
|
When going to the `Permissions` tab for all users, you will see these
|
|
permission types listed.
|
|
|
|
view::
|
|
Policies that decide if an admin can view all users in the realm.
|
|
manage::
|
|
Policies that decide if an admin can manage all users in the realm. This
|
|
permission grants the admin the privilege to perfor user role mappings, but
|
|
it does not specify which roles the admin is allowed to map. You'll need to
|
|
define the privilege for each role you want the admin to be able to map.
|
|
map-roles::
|
|
This is a subset of the privileges granted by the `manage` scope. In this
|
|
case the admin is only allowed to map roles. The admin is not allowed to perform
|
|
any other user management operation. Also, like `manage`, the roles that the
|
|
admin is allowed to apply must be specified per role or per set of roles if dealing
|
|
with client roles.
|
|
manage-group-membership::
|
|
Similar to `map-roles` except that it pertains to group membership: which
|
|
groups a user can be added or removed from. These
|
|
policies just grant the admin permission to manage group membership, not which
|
|
groups the admin is allowed to manage membership for. You'll have to
|
|
specify policies for each group's `manage-members` permission.
|
|
impersonate::
|
|
Policies that decide if the admin is allowed to impersonate other users. These
|
|
policies are applied to the admin's attributes and role mappings.
|
|
user-impersonated::
|
|
Policies that decide which users can be impersonated. These policies will be
|
|
applied to the user being impersonated. For example, you might want to define
|
|
a policy that will forbid anybody from impersonating a user that has admin
|
|
privileges.
|
|
|
|
===== Group
|
|
|
|
When going to the `Permissions` tab for a specific group, you will see these
|
|
permission types listed.
|
|
|
|
view::
|
|
Policies that decide if the admin can view information about the group.
|
|
manage::
|
|
Policies that decide if the admin can manage the configuration of the group.
|
|
view-members::
|
|
Policies that decide if the admin can view the user details of members of the group.
|
|
manage-members::
|
|
Policies that decide if the admin can manage the users that belong to this group.
|
|
manage-membership::
|
|
Policies that decide if an admin can change the membership of the group. Add or
|
|
remove members from the group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|