48 lines
No EOL
2.7 KiB
XML
Executable file
48 lines
No EOL
2.7 KiB
XML
Executable file
<!--
|
|
~ Copyright 2016 Red Hat, Inc. and/or its affiliates
|
|
~ and other contributors as indicated by the @author tags.
|
|
~
|
|
~ Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
~ you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
~ You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
~
|
|
~ http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
~
|
|
~ Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
~ distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
~ WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
~ See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
~ limitations under the License.
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
<chapter id="groups">
|
|
<title>Groups</title>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Groups in Keycloak allow you to manage a common set of attributes and role mappings for a large set of users.
|
|
Users can be members of zero or more groups. Users inherit the attributes and role mappings assign to each group.
|
|
As an admin this makes it easy for you to manage permissions for a user in one place.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Groups are hierarchical. A group can have many subgroups, but a group can only have one parent. Subgroups inherit
|
|
the attributes and role mappings from the parent. This applies to user as well. So, if you have a parent group and a child group
|
|
and a user that only belongs to the child group, the user inherits the attributes and role mappings of both the
|
|
parent and child.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<section>
|
|
<title>Groups vs. Roles</title>
|
|
<para>
|
|
In the IT world the concepts of Group and Role are often blurred and interchangeable. In Keycloak, Groups are just
|
|
a collection of users that you can apply roles and attributes to in one place. Roles are used to assign permissions
|
|
and access control.
|
|
</para>
|
|
<para>
|
|
Keycloak Roles have the concept of a Composite Role. A role can be associated with one or more additional roles.
|
|
This is called a Composite Role. If a user has a role mapping to the Composite Role, they inherit all the roles associated
|
|
with the composite. So what's the difference from a Keycloak Group and a Composite Role? Logically they could be
|
|
used for the same exact thing. The difference is conceptual. Composite roles should be used to compose the
|
|
permission model of your set of services and applications. So, roles become a set of permissions. Groups on the
|
|
other hand, would be a set of users that have a set of permissions. Use Groups to manage users, composite roles to
|
|
manage applications and services.
|
|
</para>
|
|
</section>
|
|
</chapter> |