keycloak-scim/docs/documentation/authorization_services/topics/auth-services-architecture.adoc
Marek Posolda 94b5f05c64
Re-add links to policy-enforcer to the authorization services documen… (#33905)
closes #32644

Signed-off-by: mposolda <mposolda@gmail.com>


Co-authored-by: andymunro <48995441+andymunro@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Marek Posolda <mposolda@gmail.com>
2024-10-15 08:34:56 +02:00

130 lines
7.6 KiB
Text

[[_overview_architecture]]
= Architecture
image:images/authz-arch-overview.png[alt="{project_name} AuthZ architecture overview"]
From a design perspective, Authorization Services is based on a well-defined set of authorization patterns providing these capabilities:
* **Policy Administration Point (PAP)**
+
Provides a set of UIs based on the {project_name} Administration Console to manage resource servers, resources, scopes, permissions, and policies.
Part of this is also accomplished remotely through the use of the <<_service_protection_api, Protection API>>.
+
* **Policy Decision Point (PDP)**
+
Provides a distributable policy decision point to where authorization requests are sent and policies are evaluated accordingly with the permissions being requested.
For more information, see <<_service_obtaining_permissions, Obtaining Permissions>>.
+
* **Policy Enforcement Point (PEP)**
+
Provides implementations for different environments to actually enforce authorization decisions at the resource server side.
{project_name} provides some built-in <<_enforcer_overview, Policy Enforcers>>.
+
* **Policy Information Point (PIP)**
+
Being based on {project_name} Authentication Server, you can obtain attributes from identities and runtime environment during the evaluation of authorization policies.
== The authorization process
Three main processes define the necessary steps to understand how to use {project_name} to enable fine-grained authorization to your applications:
* *Resource Management*
* *Permission and Policy Management*
* *Policy Enforcement*
=== Resource management
*Resource Management* involves all the necessary steps to define what is being protected.
image:images/resource-mgmt-process.png[alt="Resource management overview"]
First, you need to specify {project_name} what are you looking to protect, which usually represents a web application or a set of one or more services. For more information on resource servers see <<_overview_terminology, Terminology>>.
Resource servers are managed using the {project_name} Administration Console. There you can enable any registered client application as a resource server and start managing the resources and scopes you want to protect.
image:images/rs-r-scopes.png[alt="Resource Server overview"]
A resource can be a web page, a RESTFul resource, a file in your file system, an EJB, and so on. They can represent a group of resources (just like a Class in Java) or they can represent a single and specific resource.
For instance, you might have a _Bank Account_ resource that represents all banking accounts and use it to define the authorization policies that are common to all banking accounts. However, you might want to define specific policies for _Alice Account_ (a resource instance that belongs to a customer), where only the owner is allowed to access some information or perform an operation.
Resources can be managed using the {project_name} Administration Console or the <<_service_protection_api, Protection API>>. In the latter case, resource servers are able to manage their resources remotely.
Scopes usually represent the actions that can be performed on a resource, but they are not limited to that. You can also use scopes to represent one or more attributes within a resource.
=== Permission and policy management
Once you have defined your resource server and all the resources you want to protect, you must set up permissions and policies.
This process involves all the necessary steps to actually define the security and access requirements that govern your resources.
image:images/policy-mgmt-process.png[alt="Permission and policy management overview"]
Policies define the conditions that must be satisfied to access or perform operations on something (resource or scope), but they are not tied to what they are protecting. They are generic and can be reused to build permissions or even more complex policies.
For instance, to allow access to a group of resources only for users granted with a role "User Premium", you can use RBAC (Role-based Access Control).
{project_name} provides a few built-in policy types (and their respective policy providers) covering the most common access control mechanisms. You can even create policies based on rules written using JavaScript.
Once you have your policies defined, you can start defining your permissions. Permissions are coupled with the resource they are protecting. Here you specify
what you want to protect (resource or scope) and the policies that must be satisfied to grant or deny permission.
=== Policy enforcement
*Policy Enforcement* involves the necessary steps to actually enforce authorization decisions to a resource server. This is achieved by enabling a *Policy Enforcement Point* or PEP at the resource server that is capable of communicating with the authorization server, ask for authorization data and control access to protected resources based on the decisions and permissions returned by the server.
image:images/pep-pattern-diagram.png[alt="PEP overview"]
{project_name} provides some built-in <<_enforcer_overview, Policy Enforcers>> implementations that you can use to protect your applications depending on the platform they are running on.
== Authorization services
Authorization services consist of the following RESTFul endpoints:
* *Token Endpoint*
* *Resource Management Endpoint*
* *Permission Management Endpoint*
Each of these services provides a specific API covering the different steps involved in the authorization process.
=== Token endpoint
OAuth2 clients (such as front end applications) can obtain access tokens from the server using the token endpoint and use
these same tokens to access resources protected by a resource server (such as back end services). In the same way,
{project_name} Authorization Services provide extensions to OAuth2 to allow access tokens to be issued based on the processing
of all policies associated with the resource(s) or scope(s) being requested. This means that resource servers can enforce access
to their protected resources based on the permissions granted by the server and held by an access token. In {project_name} Authorization Services
the access token with permissions is called a Requesting Party Token or RPT for short.
[role="_additional-resources"]
.Additional resources
* <<_service_obtaining_permissions, Obtaining Permissions>>
=== Protection API
The *Protection API* is a set of https://docs.kantarainitiative.org/uma/wg/oauth-uma-federated-authz-2.0-09.html[UMA-compliant] endpoint-providing operations
for resource servers to help them manage their resources, scopes, permissions, and policies associated with them. Only resource servers are allowed to access this API, which also requires a
*uma_protection* scope.
The operations provided by the Protection API can be organized in two main groups:
* *Resource Management*
** Create Resource
** Delete Resource
** Find by Id
** Query
* *Permission Management*
** Issue Permission Tickets
[NOTE]
By default, Remote Resource Management is enabled. You can change that using the {project_name} Administration Console and only allow resource management through the console.
When using the UMA protocol, the issuance of Permission Tickets by the Protection API is an important part of the whole authorization process. As described in a subsequent section, they represent the permissions being requested by the client and that are sent to the server to obtain a final token with all permissions granted during the evaluation of the permissions and policies associated with the resources and scopes being requested.
[role="_additional-resources"]
.Additional resources
* <<_service_protection_api, Protection API>>