1st iteration complete
This commit is contained in:
Bill Burke
parent
cb4a9f5266
commit
7219645b46
1 changed files with 608 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ _capability_ _interfaces_ for the features you are able to. Here's a list of in
|
|||
|`org.keycloak.storage.user.UserLookupProvider`|This interface is required if you want to be able to login with users from this external store. Most (all?) providers implement this interface.
|
||||
|`org.keycloak.storage.user.UserQueryProvider`|Defines complex queries that are used to locate one or more users. You must implement this interface if you want to view and manager users from the administration console.
|
||||
|`org.keycloak.storage.user.UserRegistrationProvider`|Implement this interface if your provider supports adding and removing users.
|
||||
|`org.keycloak.storage.user.UserBulkUupdateProvider`|Implement this interface if your provider supports bulk update of a set of users.
|
||||
|`org.keycloak.storage.user.UserBulkUpdateProvider`|Implement this interface if your provider supports bulk update of a set of users.
|
||||
|`org.keycloak.credential.CredentialInputValidator`|Implement this interface if your provider can validate one or more different credential types. (i.e. can validate a password)
|
||||
|`org.keycloak.credential.CredentialInputUpdater`|Implement this interface if your provider supports updating one more different credential types.
|
||||
|===
|
||||
|
|
@ -426,7 +426,8 @@ Now that the provider class is complete, we now turn our attention to the provid
|
|||
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class PropertyFileUserStorageProviderFactory implements UserStorageProviderFactory<PropertyFileUserStorageProvider> {
|
||||
public class PropertyFileUserStorageProviderFactory
|
||||
implements UserStorageProviderFactory<PropertyFileUserStorageProvider> {
|
||||
|
||||
public static final String PROVIDER_NAME = "readonly-property-file";
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -579,7 +580,8 @@ inherits these methods from the `org.keycloak.component.ComponentFactory` interf
|
|||
List<ProviderConfigProperty> getConfigProperties();
|
||||
|
||||
default
|
||||
void validateConfiguration(KeycloakSession session, RealmModel realm, ComponentModel model) throws ComponentValidationException
|
||||
void validateConfiguration(KeycloakSession session, RealmModel realm, ComponentModel model)
|
||||
throws ComponentValidationException
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -607,7 +609,9 @@ file on disk.
|
|||
.PropertyFileUserStorageProviderFactory
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class PropertyFileUserStorageProviderFactory implements UserStorageProviderFactory<PropertyFileUserStorageProvider> {
|
||||
public class PropertyFileUserStorageProviderFactory
|
||||
implements UserStorageProviderFactory<PropertyFileUserStorageProvider> {
|
||||
|
||||
protected static final List<ProviderConfigProperty> configMetadata;
|
||||
|
||||
static {
|
||||
|
|
@ -688,6 +692,605 @@ Now that the configuration is enabled, you can set the `path` variable when you
|
|||
.Configured Provider
|
||||
image:../{{book.images}}/storage-provider-with-config.png[]
|
||||
|
||||
=== Registration and Query Capability interfaces
|
||||
|
||||
One thing we have not done with our example is allow it to add and remove users or change passwords. Users defined in our example are
|
||||
also not queryable or viewable in the admin console. To add these enhancements, our example provider must implement
|
||||
the `UserQueryProvider` and `UserRegistrationProvider` interfaces.
|
||||
|
||||
==== Implementing UserRegistrationProvider
|
||||
|
||||
To implement adding and removing users from this particular store, we first have to be able to save our properties
|
||||
file to disk.
|
||||
|
||||
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public void save() {
|
||||
String path = model.getConfig().getFirst("path");
|
||||
path = EnvUtil.replace(path);
|
||||
try {
|
||||
FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(path);
|
||||
properties.store(fos, "");
|
||||
fos.close();
|
||||
} catch (IOException e) {
|
||||
throw new RuntimeException(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Then, the implementation of the `addUser()` and `removeUser()` methods becomes pretty simple.
|
||||
|
||||
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public static final String UNSET_PASSWORD="#$!-UNSET-PASSWORD";
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public UserModel addUser(RealmModel realm, String username) {
|
||||
synchronized (properties) {
|
||||
properties.setProperty(username, UNSET_PASSWORD);
|
||||
save();
|
||||
}
|
||||
return createAdapter(realm, username);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public boolean removeUser(RealmModel realm, UserModel user) {
|
||||
synchronized (properties) {
|
||||
if (properties.remove(user.getUsername()) == null) return false;
|
||||
save();
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Notice that when adding a user we set the password value of the property map to be `UNSET_PASSWORD`. We do this as
|
||||
we can't have null values for a property in the property value. We also have to modify the `CredentialInputValidator`
|
||||
methods to reflect this.
|
||||
|
||||
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public boolean isValid(RealmModel realm, UserModel user, CredentialInput input) {
|
||||
if (!supportsCredentialType(input.getType()) || !(input instanceof UserCredentialModel)) return false;
|
||||
|
||||
UserCredentialModel cred = (UserCredentialModel)input;
|
||||
String password = properties.getProperty(user.getUsername());
|
||||
if (password == null || UNSET_PASSWORD.equals(password)) return false;
|
||||
return password.equals(cred.getValue());
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Since we can now save our property file, probably also makes sense to allow password updates.
|
||||
|
||||
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public boolean updateCredential(RealmModel realm, UserModel user, CredentialInput input) {
|
||||
if (!(input instanceof UserCredentialModel)) return false;
|
||||
if (!input.getType().equals(CredentialModel.PASSWORD)) return false;
|
||||
UserCredentialModel cred = (UserCredentialModel)input;
|
||||
synchronized (properties) {
|
||||
properties.setProperty(user.getUsername(), cred.getValue());
|
||||
save();
|
||||
}
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
We can now also implement disabling a password too.
|
||||
|
||||
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void disableCredentialType(RealmModel realm, UserModel user, String credentialType) {
|
||||
if (!credentialType.equals(CredentialModel.PASSWORD)) return;
|
||||
synchronized (properties) {
|
||||
properties.setProperty(user.getUsername(), UNSET_PASSWORD);
|
||||
save();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private static final Set<String> disableableTypes = new HashSet<>();
|
||||
|
||||
static {
|
||||
disableableTypes.add(CredentialModel.PASSWORD);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public Set<String> getDisableableCredentialTypes(RealmModel realm, UserModel user) {
|
||||
|
||||
return disableableTypes;
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
With these methods implemented, you'll now be able to change and disable the password for the user in the admin console.
|
||||
|
||||
==== Implementing UserQueryProvider
|
||||
|
||||
Without implementing `UserQueryProvider` the admin console would not be able to view and manage users that were loaded
|
||||
by our example provider. Let's look at implementing this interface.
|
||||
|
||||
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public int getUsersCount(RealmModel realm) {
|
||||
return properties.size();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public List<UserModel> getUsers(RealmModel realm) {
|
||||
return getUsers(realm, 0, Integer.MAX_VALUE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public List<UserModel> getUsers(RealmModel realm, int firstResult, int maxResults) {
|
||||
List<UserModel> users = new LinkedList<>();
|
||||
int i = 0;
|
||||
for (Object obj : properties.keySet()) {
|
||||
if (i++ < firstResult) continue;
|
||||
String username = (String)obj;
|
||||
UserModel user = getUserByUsername(username, realm);
|
||||
users.add(user);
|
||||
if (users.size() >= maxResults) break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return users;
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The `getUser()` method simple iterates the key set of the property file delegating to `getuserByUsername` to load a user.
|
||||
Notice that we are indexing this call based on the `firstResult` and `maxResults` parameter. If your external store
|
||||
doesn't support pagination, you'll have to do similar logic.
|
||||
|
||||
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public List<UserModel> searchForUser(String search, RealmModel realm) {
|
||||
return searchForUser(search, realm, 0, Integer.MAX_VALUE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public List<UserModel> searchForUser(String search, RealmModel realm, int firstResult, int maxResults) {
|
||||
List<UserModel> users = new LinkedList<>();
|
||||
int i = 0;
|
||||
for (Object obj : properties.keySet()) {
|
||||
String username = (String)obj;
|
||||
if (!username.contains(search)) continue;
|
||||
if (i++ < firstResult) continue;
|
||||
UserModel user = getUserByUsername(username, realm);
|
||||
users.add(user);
|
||||
if (users.size() >= maxResults) break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return users;
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The first declaration of `searchForUser()` takes a string paraeter. This is supposed to be a string that you use to
|
||||
search username and email attributes to find the user. This string can be a substring which is why we use the `String.contains()`
|
||||
method when doing our search.
|
||||
|
||||
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public List<UserModel> searchForUser(Map<String, String> params, RealmModel realm) {
|
||||
return searchForUser(params, realm, 0, Integer.MAX_VALUE);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public List<UserModel> searchForUser(Map<String, String> params, RealmModel realm, int firstResult, int maxResults) {
|
||||
// only support searching by username
|
||||
String usernameSearchString = params.get("username");
|
||||
if (usernameSearchString == null) return Collections.EMPTY_LIST;
|
||||
return searchForUser(usernameSearchString, realm, firstResult, maxResults);
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The `searchForUser()` method that takes a `Map` parameter can search for a user based on first, last name, username, and email.
|
||||
We only store usernames, so we only search based on usernames. We delegate to `searchForUser()` for this.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public List<UserModel> getGroupMembers(RealmModel realm, GroupModel group, int firstResult, int maxResults) {
|
||||
return Collections.EMPTY_LIST;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public List<UserModel> getGroupMembers(RealmModel realm, GroupModel group) {
|
||||
return Collections.EMPTY_LIST;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public List<UserModel> searchForUserByUserAttribute(String attrName, String attrValue, RealmModel realm) {
|
||||
return Collections.EMPTY_LIST;
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
We don't store and groups or attributes, so the other methods just return an empty list.
|
||||
|
||||
=== Augmenting External Storage
|
||||
|
||||
The `PropertyProfileUserStorageProvider` example is really limited. While we will be able to login with users stored
|
||||
in a property file, we won't be able to do much else. If users loaded by this provider need special role or group
|
||||
mappings to fully access particular applications there is no way for us to add additional role mappings to these users.
|
||||
You also can't modify or add additional important attributes like email, first and last name.
|
||||
|
||||
For these types of situations, {{book.project.name}} allows you to augment your external store by storing extra information
|
||||
in {{book.project.name}}'s database. This is called federated user storage and is encapsulated within the
|
||||
`org.keycloak.storage.federated.UserFederatedStorageProvider` class.
|
||||
|
||||
.UserFederatedStorageProvider
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package org.keycloak.storage.federated;
|
||||
|
||||
public interface UserFederatedStorageProvider extends Provider {
|
||||
|
||||
Set<GroupModel> getGroups(RealmModel realm, String userId);
|
||||
void joinGroup(RealmModel realm, String userId, GroupModel group);
|
||||
void leaveGroup(RealmModel realm, String userId, GroupModel group);
|
||||
List<String> getMembership(RealmModel realm, GroupModel group, int firstResult, int max);
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
The `UserFederatedStorageProvider` instance is available on the `KeycloakSession.userFederatedStorage()` method.
|
||||
It has all different kinds of methods for storing attributes, group and role mappings, different credential types,
|
||||
and required actions. If your external store's datamodel cannot support the full {{book.project.name}} feature
|
||||
set, then this service can fill in the gaps.
|
||||
|
||||
{{book.project.name}} comes with a helper class `org.keycloak.storage.adapter.AbstractUserAdapterFederatedStorage`
|
||||
that will delegate every single `UserModel` method except get/set of username to user federated storage. Override
|
||||
the methods you need to override to delegate to your external storage representations. It is strongly
|
||||
suggested you read the javadoc of this class as it has smaller protected methods you may want to override. Specifically
|
||||
surrounding group membership and role mappings.
|
||||
|
||||
==== Augmentation Example
|
||||
|
||||
In our `PropertyFileUserStorageProvider` example, we just need a simple change to our provider to use the
|
||||
`AbstractUserAdapterFederatedStorage`.
|
||||
|
||||
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
protected UserModel createAdapter(RealmModel realm, String username) {
|
||||
return new AbstractUserAdapterFederatedStorage(session, realm, model) {
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public String getUsername() {
|
||||
return username;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void setUsername(String username) {
|
||||
String pw = (String)properties.remove(username);
|
||||
if (pw != null) {
|
||||
properties.put(username, pw);
|
||||
save();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
We instead define an anonymous class implementation of `AbstractUserAdapterFederatedStorage`. The `setUsername()`
|
||||
method makes changes to the properties file and saves it.
|
||||
|
||||
=== Import Implementation Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
When implementing a user storage provider, there's another strategy you can take. Instead of using user federated storage,
|
||||
you can create a user locally in the {{book.project.name}} built in user database and copy attributes from your external
|
||||
store into this local copy. There are a bunch of advantages to this approach.
|
||||
|
||||
* {{book.project.name}} basically becomes a persistence user cache for your external store. Once the user is imported
|
||||
you'll no longer hit the external store thus taking load off of it.
|
||||
* If you are moving to {{book.project.name}} as your official user store and deprecating the old external store, you
|
||||
can slowly migrate applications to use {{book.project.name}}. When all applications have been migrated, unlink the
|
||||
imported user, and retire the old legacy external store.
|
||||
|
||||
There are some obvious disadvantages though to using an import strategy:
|
||||
|
||||
* Looking up a user for the first time will require multiple updates to {{book.project.name}} database. This can
|
||||
be a big performance loss under load and put a lot of strain on the {{book.project.name}} database. The user federated
|
||||
storage approach will only store extra data as needed and may never be used depending on the capabilities of your external store.
|
||||
* With the import approach, you have to keep local keycloak storage and external storage in sync. The User Storage SPI
|
||||
has capability interfaces that you can implement to support synchronization, but this can quickly become painful and messy.
|
||||
|
||||
To implement the import strategy you simply check to see first if the user has been imported locally. If so return the
|
||||
local user, if not create the user locally and import data from the external store. You can also proxy the local user
|
||||
so that most changes are automatically synchronized.
|
||||
|
||||
This will be a bit contrived, but we can extend our `PropertyFileUserStorageProvider` to take this approach. We
|
||||
begin first by modifying the `createAdapter()` method.
|
||||
|
||||
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
|
||||
[source.java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
protected UserModel createAdapter(RealmModel realm, String username) {
|
||||
UserModel local = session.userLocalStorage().getUserByUsername(username, realm);
|
||||
if (local == null) {
|
||||
local = session.userLocalStorage().addUser(realm, username);
|
||||
local.setFederationLink(model.getId());
|
||||
}
|
||||
return new UserModelDelegate(local) {
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void setUsername(String username) {
|
||||
String pw = (String)properties.remove(username);
|
||||
if (pw != null) {
|
||||
properties.put(username, pw);
|
||||
save();
|
||||
}
|
||||
super.setUsername(username);
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
In this method we call the `KeycloakSession.userLocalStorage()` method to obtain a reference to local {{book.project.name}}
|
||||
user storage. We see if the user is stored locally, if not, we add it locally. Also note that we call
|
||||
`UserModel.setFederationLink()` and pass in the id of the `ComponentModel` of our provider. This sets a link between
|
||||
the provider and the imported user.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: When a user storage provider is removed, any user imported by it will also be removed. This is one of the
|
||||
purposes of calling `UserModel.setFederationLink()`.
|
||||
|
||||
Another thing to note is that if a local user is linked, your storage provider will still be delegated to for methods
|
||||
that it implements from the `CredentialInputValidator` and `CredentialInputUpdater` interfaces. Returning `false`
|
||||
from a validation or update will just result in {{book.project.name}} seeing if it can validate or update using
|
||||
local storage.
|
||||
|
||||
Also notice that we are proxying the local user using the `org.keycloak.models.utils.UserModelDelegate' class.
|
||||
This class is an implementation of `UserModel`. Every method just delegates to the `UserModel` it was instantiated with.
|
||||
We override the `setUsername()` method of this delegate class to synchronize automatically with the property file.
|
||||
For your providers, you can use this to _intercept_ other methods on the local `UserModel` to perform synchronization
|
||||
with your extern store. For example, get methods could make sure that the local store is in sync. Set methods
|
||||
keep external store in sync with local one.
|
||||
|
||||
==== ImportedUserValidation Interface
|
||||
|
||||
If you remember earlier in this chapter, we discussed how querying for a user worked. Local storage is queried first,
|
||||
if the user is found there, then the query ends. This is a problem for our above implementation as we want
|
||||
to proxy the local `UserModel` so that we can keep usernames in sync. The User Storage SPI has a callback for whenever
|
||||
a linked local user is loaded from the local database.
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package org.keycloak.storage.user;
|
||||
public interface ImportedUserValidation {
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* If this method returns null, then the user in local storage will be removed
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param realm
|
||||
* @param user
|
||||
* @return null if user no longer valid
|
||||
*/
|
||||
UserModel validate(RealmModel realm, UserModel user);
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Whenever a linked local user is loaded, if the user storage provider class implements this interface, then the
|
||||
`validate()` method is called. Here you can proxy the local user passed in as a parameter and return it. That
|
||||
new `UserModel` will be used. You can also optionally do a check to see if the user exists still in the external store.
|
||||
if `validate()` returns `null`, then the local user will be removed from the database.
|
||||
|
||||
==== ImportSynchronization Interface
|
||||
|
||||
With the import strategy you can see that it would be possible for the local user copy could get out of sync with
|
||||
external storage. For example, maybe a user has been removed from the external store. The User Storage SPI has
|
||||
an additional interface you can implement to deal with this. `org.keycloak.storage.user.ImportSynchronization`.
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
package org.keycloak.storage.user;
|
||||
|
||||
public interface ImportSynchronization {
|
||||
SynchronizationResult sync(KeycloakSessionFactory sessionFactory, String realmId, UserStorageProviderModel model);
|
||||
SynchronizationResult syncSince(Date lastSync, KeycloakSessionFactory sessionFactory, String realmId, UserStorageProviderModel model);
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
This interface is implemented by the provider factory. Once this interface is implemented by the provider factory,
|
||||
the admin console management page for the provider will show additional options. There is a button that will allow
|
||||
you to manually force a synchronization. This invokes the `ImportSynchronization.sync()` method. Also, some additional
|
||||
configuration options will show up that allow you to automatically schedule a synchronization. Automatic syncs invoke
|
||||
the `syncSince()` method.
|
||||
|
||||
=== User Caches
|
||||
|
||||
When a user is loaded by id, username, or email queries it will be cached. When a user is cached, it iterates through
|
||||
the entire `UserModel` interface and pulls this information to a local in-memory only cache. In a cluster, this cache
|
||||
is still local, but it becomes an invalidation cache. When a user is modified, it is evicted. This eviction event
|
||||
is propagated to the entire cluster so that other nodes' user cache is also invalidated.
|
||||
|
||||
==== Managing the user cache
|
||||
|
||||
You can get access to the user cache by calling `KeycloakSession.userCache()`.
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* All these methods effect an entire cluster of Keycloak instances.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @author <a href="mailto:bill@burkecentral.com">Bill Burke</a>
|
||||
* @version $Revision: 1 $
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public interface UserCache extends UserProvider {
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Evict user from cache.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param user
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void evict(RealmModel realm, UserModel user);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Evict users of a specific realm
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param realm
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void evict(RealmModel realm);
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Clear cache entirely.
|
||||
*
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void clear();
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
There are methods for evicting a specific users, users contained in a specific realm, or the entire cache.
|
||||
|
||||
==== OnUserCache Callback Interface
|
||||
|
||||
You may want to cache additional information that is specific to your provider implementation. The User Storage SPI
|
||||
has a callback whenever a user is cached: `org.keycloak.models.cache.OnUserCache`.
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public interface OnUserCache {
|
||||
void onCache(RealmModel realm, CachedUserModel user, UserModel delegate);
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
Your provider class should implement this interface if it wants this callback. The `UserModel` delegate parameter
|
||||
is the `UserModel` instance returned by your provider. The `CachedUserModel` is an expanded `UserModel` interface.
|
||||
This is the instance that is cached locally in local storage.
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public interface CachedUserModel extends UserModel {
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Invalidates the cache for this user and returns a delegate that represents the actual data provider
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return
|
||||
*/
|
||||
UserModel getDelegateForUpdate();
|
||||
|
||||
boolean isMarkedForEviction();
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Invalidate the cache for this model
|
||||
*
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void invalidate();
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* When was the model was loaded from database.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return
|
||||
*/
|
||||
long getCacheTimestamp();
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Returns a map that contains custom things that are cached along with this model. You can write to this map.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ConcurrentHashMap getCachedWith();
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
This `CachedUserModel` interface allows you to evict the user from cache and get the provider `UserModel` instance.
|
||||
The most interesting method is `getCachedWith()`. This returns a map that allows you to cache additional information
|
||||
pertaining to the user. For example, credentials are not part of the `UserModel` interface. If you wanted to cache
|
||||
credentials in memory, you would implement `OnUserCache` and cache your user's credentials using the `getCachedWith()`
|
||||
method.
|
||||
|
||||
==== Cache Policies
|
||||
|
||||
Each configured user storage provider can specify unique cache policies. Go to the admin console management page
|
||||
for your provider to see how to do this.
|
||||
|
||||
=== Leveraging Java EE to Build User Storage Providers
|
||||
|
||||
The user storage providers can be packaged within any Java EE component so long as you set up the `META-INF/services`
|
||||
file correctly to point to your providers. For example, if your provider needs to use third party libraries, you
|
||||
can package up your provider within an ear and store these third pary libraries in the ear's `lib/` directory.
|
||||
Also note that provider jars can make use of the `jboss-deployment-structure.xml` file that EJBs, WARS, and EARs
|
||||
can use in a JBoss/Wildfly environment. See the JBoss/Wildfly documentation for more details on this file. It
|
||||
allows you to pull in external dependencies among other fine grain actions.
|
||||
|
||||
Implementations of `UserStorageProviderFactory` are required to be plain java objects. But, we also currently support
|
||||
implementing `UserStorageProvider` classes as Stateful EJBs. This is especially useful if you want to use JPA
|
||||
to connect to a relational store. This is how you would do it:
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
@Stateful
|
||||
@Local(EjbExampleUserStorageProvider.class)
|
||||
public class EjbExampleUserStorageProvider implements UserStorageProvider,
|
||||
UserLookupProvider,
|
||||
UserRegistrationProvider,
|
||||
UserQueryProvider,
|
||||
CredentialInputUpdater,
|
||||
CredentialInputValidator,
|
||||
OnUserCache
|
||||
{
|
||||
@PersistenceContext
|
||||
protected EntityManager em;
|
||||
|
||||
protected ComponentModel model;
|
||||
protected KeycloakSession session;
|
||||
|
||||
public void setModel(ComponentModel model) {
|
||||
this.model = model;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void setSession(KeycloakSession session) {
|
||||
this.session = session;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@Remove
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public void close() {
|
||||
}
|
||||
...
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
You have to define the `@Local` annotation and specify your provider class there. If you don't do this, EJB will
|
||||
not proxy the user correctly and your provider won't work.
|
||||
|
||||
You must put the `@Remove` annotation on the `close()` method of your provider. If you don't, the stateful bean
|
||||
will never be cleaned up and you may eventually see error messages.
|
||||
|
||||
Implementations of `UserStorageProviderFactory` are required to be plain java objects. Your factory class would
|
||||
perform a JNDI lookup of the Stateful EJB in its create() method.
|
||||
|
||||
[source,java]
|
||||
----
|
||||
public class EjbExampleUserStorageProviderFactory
|
||||
implements UserStorageProviderFactory<EjbExampleUserStorageProvider> {
|
||||
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
public EjbExampleUserStorageProvider create(KeycloakSession session, ComponentModel model) {
|
||||
try {
|
||||
InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext();
|
||||
EjbExampleUserStorageProvider provider = (EjbExampleUserStorageProvider)ctx.lookup(
|
||||
"java:global/user-storage-jpa-example/" + EjbExampleUserStorageProvider.class.getSimpleName());
|
||||
provider.setModel(model);
|
||||
provider.setSession(session);
|
||||
return provider;
|
||||
} catch (Exception e) {
|
||||
throw new RuntimeException(e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
----
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue