libre.sh/keycloak-scim
3
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 15 Pull requests Releases 1 Packages Activity Actions

Merge pull request #16 from patriot1burke/master

Browse source 
reformat for gitbook
This commit is contained in:
Bill Burke 2016-12-02 19:56:15 -05:00 committed by GitHub
commit 6b82f0868c
13 changed files with 1281 additions and 1265 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

11
SUMMARY.adoc
View file

@ -11,3 +11,14 @@
. link:topics/events.adoc[Event Listener SPI]
{% endif %}
. link:topics/user-storage.adoc[User Storage SPI]
.. link:topics/user-storage/provider-interfaces.adoc[Provider Interfaces]
.. link:topics/user-storage/provider-capability-interfaces.adoc[Provider Capability Interfaces]
.. link:topics/user-storage/model-interfaces.adoc[Model Interfaces]
.. link:topics/user-storage/packaging.adoc[Packaging and Deployment]
.. link:topics/user-storage/simple-example.adoc[Simple Read Only, Lookup Example]
.. link:topics/user-storage/configuration.adoc[Configuration Techniques]
.. link:topics/user-storage/registration-query.adoc[Add/Remove User and Query Capability interfaces]
.. link:topics/user-storage/augmenting.adoc[Augmenting External Storage]
.. link:topics/user-storage/import.adoc[Import Implementation Strategy]
.. link:topics/user-storage/cache.adoc[User Caches]
.. link:topics/user-storage/javaee.adoc[Leveraging Java EE ]

1265
topics/user-storage.adoc
View file

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load diff

69
topics/user-storage/augmenting.adoc Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
=== Augmenting External Storage
The `PropertyProfileUserStorageProvider` example is really limited. While we will be able to login with users stored
in a property file, we won't be able to do much else. If users loaded by this provider need special role or group
mappings to fully access particular applications there is no way for us to add additional role mappings to these users.
You also can't modify or add additional important attributes like email, first and last name.
For these types of situations, {{book.project.name}} allows you to augment your external store by storing extra information
in {{book.project.name}}'s database. This is called federated user storage and is encapsulated within the
`org.keycloak.storage.federated.UserFederatedStorageProvider` class.
.UserFederatedStorageProvider
[source,java]
----
package org.keycloak.storage.federated;
public interface UserFederatedStorageProvider extends Provider {
Set<GroupModel> getGroups(RealmModel realm, String userId);
void joinGroup(RealmModel realm, String userId, GroupModel group);
void leaveGroup(RealmModel realm, String userId, GroupModel group);
List<String> getMembership(RealmModel realm, GroupModel group, int firstResult, int max);
...
----
The `UserFederatedStorageProvider` instance is available on the `KeycloakSession.userFederatedStorage()` method.
It has all different kinds of methods for storing attributes, group and role mappings, different credential types,
and required actions. If your external store's datamodel cannot support the full {{book.project.name}} feature
set, then this service can fill in the gaps.
{{book.project.name}} comes with a helper class `org.keycloak.storage.adapter.AbstractUserAdapterFederatedStorage`
that will delegate every single `UserModel` method except get/set of username to user federated storage. Override
the methods you need to override to delegate to your external storage representations. It is strongly
suggested you read the javadoc of this class as it has smaller protected methods you may want to override. Specifically
surrounding group membership and role mappings.
==== Augmentation Example
In our `PropertyFileUserStorageProvider` example, we just need a simple change to our provider to use the
`AbstractUserAdapterFederatedStorage`.
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
[source,java]
----
protected UserModel createAdapter(RealmModel realm, String username) {
return new AbstractUserAdapterFederatedStorage(session, realm, model) {
@Override
public String getUsername() {
return username;
}
@Override
public void setUsername(String username) {
String pw = (String)properties.remove(username);
if (pw != null) {
properties.put(username, pw);
save();
}
}
};
}
----
We instead define an anonymous class implementation of `AbstractUserAdapterFederatedStorage`. The `setUsername()`
method makes changes to the properties file and saves it.

107
topics/user-storage/cache.adoc Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
=== User Caches
When a user is loaded by id, username, or email queries it will be cached. When a user is cached, it iterates through
the entire `UserModel` interface and pulls this information to a local in-memory only cache. In a cluster, this cache
is still local, but it becomes an invalidation cache. When a user is modified, it is evicted. This eviction event
is propagated to the entire cluster so that other nodes' user cache is also invalidated.
==== Managing the user cache
You can get access to the user cache by calling `KeycloakSession.userCache()`.
[source,java]
----
/**
* All these methods effect an entire cluster of Keycloak instances.
*
* @author <a href="mailto:bill@burkecentral.com">Bill Burke</a>
* @version $Revision: 1 $
*/
public interface UserCache extends UserProvider {
/**
* Evict user from cache.
*
* @param user
*/
void evict(RealmModel realm, UserModel user);
/**
* Evict users of a specific realm
*
* @param realm
*/
void evict(RealmModel realm);
/**
* Clear cache entirely.
*
*/
void clear();
}
----
There are methods for evicting a specific users, users contained in a specific realm, or the entire cache.
==== OnUserCache Callback Interface
You may want to cache additional information that is specific to your provider implementation. The User Storage SPI
has a callback whenever a user is cached: `org.keycloak.models.cache.OnUserCache`.
[source,java]
----
public interface OnUserCache {
void onCache(RealmModel realm, CachedUserModel user, UserModel delegate);
}
----
Your provider class should implement this interface if it wants this callback. The `UserModel` delegate parameter
is the `UserModel` instance returned by your provider. The `CachedUserModel` is an expanded `UserModel` interface.
This is the instance that is cached locally in local storage.
[source,java]
----
public interface CachedUserModel extends UserModel {
/**
* Invalidates the cache for this user and returns a delegate that represents the actual data provider
*
* @return
*/
UserModel getDelegateForUpdate();
boolean isMarkedForEviction();
/**
* Invalidate the cache for this model
*
*/
void invalidate();
/**
* When was the model was loaded from database.
*
* @return
*/
long getCacheTimestamp();
/**
* Returns a map that contains custom things that are cached along with this model. You can write to this map.
*
* @return
*/
ConcurrentHashMap getCachedWith();
}
----
This `CachedUserModel` interface allows you to evict the user from cache and get the provider `UserModel` instance.
The most interesting method is `getCachedWith()`. This returns a map that allows you to cache additional information
pertaining to the user. For example, credentials are not part of the `UserModel` interface. If you wanted to cache
credentials in memory, you would implement `OnUserCache` and cache your user's credentials using the `getCachedWith()`
method.
==== Cache Policies
Each configured user storage provider can specify unique cache policies. Go to the admin console management page
for your provider to see how to do this.

131
topics/user-storage/configuration.adoc Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
=== Configuration Techniques
Our `PropertyFileUserStorageProvider` example is bit contrived. It is hardcoded to a property file that is embedded
in the jar of the provider. Not very useful at all. We may want to make the location of this file configurable per
instance of the provider. In other words, we may want to re-use this provider mulitple times in multiple different realms
and point to completely different user property files. We'll also want to do this configuration within the admin
console UI.
The `UserStorageProviderFactory` has additional methods you can implement that deal with provider configuration.
You describe the variables you want to configure per provider and the admin console will automatically render
a generic input page to gather this configuration. There's also callback methods to validate configuration
before it is saved, when a provider is created for the first time, and when it is updated. `UserStorageProviderFactory`
inherits these methods from the `org.keycloak.component.ComponentFactory` interface.
[source,java]
----
List<ProviderConfigProperty> getConfigProperties();
default
void validateConfiguration(KeycloakSession session, RealmModel realm, ComponentModel model)
throws ComponentValidationException
{
}
default
void onCreate(KeycloakSession session, RealmModel realm, ComponentModel model) {
}
default
void onUpdate(KeycloakSession session, RealmModel realm, ComponentModel model) {
}
----
The `ComponentFactory.getConfigProperties()` method returns a list of `org.keycloak.provider.ProviderConfigProperty`
instances. These instances declare metadata that is needed to render and store each configuration variable of the
provider.
==== Configuration Example
Let's expand our `PropertyFileUserStorageProviderFactory` example to allow you to to point a provider instance to a specific
file on disk.
.PropertyFileUserStorageProviderFactory
[source,java]
----
public class PropertyFileUserStorageProviderFactory
implements UserStorageProviderFactory<PropertyFileUserStorageProvider> {
protected static final List<ProviderConfigProperty> configMetadata;
static {
configMetadata = ProviderConfigurationBuilder.create()
.property().name("path")
.type(ProviderConfigProperty.STRING_TYPE)
.label("Path")
.defaultValue("${jboss.server.config.dir}/example-users.properties")
.helpText("File path to properties file")
.default
.add().build();
}
@Override
public List<ProviderConfigProperty> getConfigProperties() {
return configMetadata;
}
----
The `ProviderConfigurationBuilder` class is a great helper class to create a list of configuration properties. Here
we specify a variable named `path` that is a string type. In the admin console config page for this provider,
this config variable will be labed as `Path` and have a default value of `${jboss.server.config.dir}/example-users.properties`.
When you hover over the tooltip of this config option, it will display the help text `File path to properties file`.
The next thing we want to do is to verify that this file exists on disk. We don't want to enable an instance of this
provider in the realm unless it points to a valid user property file. To do this we implement the `validateConfiguration()`
method.
[source,java]
----
@Override
public void validateConfiguration(KeycloakSession session, RealmModel realm, ComponentModel config)
throws ComponentValidationException {
String fp = config.getConfig().getFirst("path");
if (fp == null) throw new ComponentValidationException("user property file does not exist");
fp = EnvUtil.replace(fp);
File file = new File(fp);
if (!file.exists()) {
throw new ComponentValidationException("user property file does not exist");
}
}
----
In the `validateConfiguration()` method we get the config variable from the `ComponentModel` and we check to see
if that file exists on disk. Notice that we use the `org.keycloak.common.util.EnvUtil.replace()`method. With this method
any string that has `${}` within it will replace that with a system property value. The `${jboss.server.config.dir}`
string corresponds to the `configuration/` directory of our server and is really useful for this example.
Next thing we have to do is remove the old `init()` method. We do this because user property files are going to be
unique per provider instance. We move this logic to the `create()` method.
[source,java]
----
@Override
public PropertyFileUserStorageProvider create(KeycloakSession session, ComponentModel model) {
String path = model.getConfig().getFirst("path");
Properties props = new Properties();
try {
InputStream is = new FileInputStream(path);
props.load(is);
is.close();
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
return new PropertyFileUserStorageProvider(session, model, props);
}
----
This logic, is of course, is really inefficient as every different transaction will read the entire user property file from disk,
but hopefully this illustrates, in a simple way, how to hook in configuration variables.
==== Configure in Admin Console
Now that the configuration is enabled, you can set the `path` variable when you configure the provider in the admin console.
.Configured Provider
image:../../{{book.images}}/storage-provider-with-config.png[]

119
topics/user-storage/import.adoc Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
=== Import Implementation Strategy
When implementing a user storage provider, there's another strategy you can take. Instead of using user federated storage,
you can create a user locally in the {{book.project.name}} built in user database and copy attributes from your external
store into this local copy. There are a bunch of advantages to this approach.
* {{book.project.name}} basically becomes a persistence user cache for your external store. Once the user is imported
you'll no longer hit the external store thus taking load off of it.
* If you are moving to {{book.project.name}} as your official user store and deprecating the old external store, you
can slowly migrate applications to use {{book.project.name}}. When all applications have been migrated, unlink the
imported user, and retire the old legacy external store.
There are some obvious disadvantages though to using an import strategy:
* Looking up a user for the first time will require multiple updates to {{book.project.name}} database. This can
be a big performance loss under load and put a lot of strain on the {{book.project.name}} database. The user federated
storage approach will only store extra data as needed and may never be used depending on the capabilities of your external store.
* With the import approach, you have to keep local keycloak storage and external storage in sync. The User Storage SPI
has capability interfaces that you can implement to support synchronization, but this can quickly become painful and messy.
To implement the import strategy you simply check to see first if the user has been imported locally. If so return the
local user, if not create the user locally and import data from the external store. You can also proxy the local user
so that most changes are automatically synchronized.
This will be a bit contrived, but we can extend our `PropertyFileUserStorageProvider` to take this approach. We
begin first by modifying the `createAdapter()` method.
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
[source.java]
----
protected UserModel createAdapter(RealmModel realm, String username) {
UserModel local = session.userLocalStorage().getUserByUsername(username, realm);
if (local == null) {
local = session.userLocalStorage().addUser(realm, username);
local.setFederationLink(model.getId());
}
return new UserModelDelegate(local) {
@Override
public void setUsername(String username) {
String pw = (String)properties.remove(username);
if (pw != null) {
properties.put(username, pw);
save();
}
super.setUsername(username);
}
};
}
----
In this method we call the `KeycloakSession.userLocalStorage()` method to obtain a reference to local {{book.project.name}}
user storage. We see if the user is stored locally, if not, we add it locally. Also note that we call
`UserModel.setFederationLink()` and pass in the id of the `ComponentModel` of our provider. This sets a link between
the provider and the imported user.
NOTE: When a user storage provider is removed, any user imported by it will also be removed. This is one of the
purposes of calling `UserModel.setFederationLink()`.
Another thing to note is that if a local user is linked, your storage provider will still be delegated to for methods
that it implements from the `CredentialInputValidator` and `CredentialInputUpdater` interfaces. Returning `false`
from a validation or update will just result in {{book.project.name}} seeing if it can validate or update using
local storage.
Also notice that we are proxying the local user using the `org.keycloak.models.utils.UserModelDelegate' class.
This class is an implementation of `UserModel`. Every method just delegates to the `UserModel` it was instantiated with.
We override the `setUsername()` method of this delegate class to synchronize automatically with the property file.
For your providers, you can use this to _intercept_ other methods on the local `UserModel` to perform synchronization
with your extern store. For example, get methods could make sure that the local store is in sync. Set methods
keep external store in sync with local one.
==== ImportedUserValidation Interface
If you remember earlier in this chapter, we discussed how querying for a user worked. Local storage is queried first,
if the user is found there, then the query ends. This is a problem for our above implementation as we want
to proxy the local `UserModel` so that we can keep usernames in sync. The User Storage SPI has a callback for whenever
a linked local user is loaded from the local database.
[source,java]
----
package org.keycloak.storage.user;
public interface ImportedUserValidation {
/**
* If this method returns null, then the user in local storage will be removed
*
* @param realm
* @param user
* @return null if user no longer valid
*/
UserModel validate(RealmModel realm, UserModel user);
}
----
Whenever a linked local user is loaded, if the user storage provider class implements this interface, then the
`validate()` method is called. Here you can proxy the local user passed in as a parameter and return it. That
new `UserModel` will be used. You can also optionally do a check to see if the user exists still in the external store.
if `validate()` returns `null`, then the local user will be removed from the database.
==== ImportSynchronization Interface
With the import strategy you can see that it would be possible for the local user copy could get out of sync with
external storage. For example, maybe a user has been removed from the external store. The User Storage SPI has
an additional interface you can implement to deal with this. `org.keycloak.storage.user.ImportSynchronization`.
[source,java]
----
package org.keycloak.storage.user;
public interface ImportSynchronization {
SynchronizationResult sync(KeycloakSessionFactory sessionFactory, String realmId, UserStorageProviderModel model);
SynchronizationResult syncSince(Date lastSync, KeycloakSessionFactory sessionFactory, String realmId, UserStorageProviderModel model);
}
----
This interface is implemented by the provider factory. Once this interface is implemented by the provider factory,
the admin console management page for the provider will show additional options. There is a button that will allow
you to manually force a synchronization. This invokes the `ImportSynchronization.sync()` method. Also, some additional
configuration options will show up that allow you to automatically schedule a synchronization. Automatic syncs invoke
the `syncSince()` method.

78
topics/user-storage/javaee.adoc Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,78 @@
=== Leveraging Java EE
The user storage providers can be packaged within any Java EE component so long as you set up the `META-INF/services`
file correctly to point to your providers. For example, if your provider needs to use third party libraries, you
can package up your provider within an ear and store these third pary libraries in the ear's `lib/` directory.
Also note that provider jars can make use of the `jboss-deployment-structure.xml` file that EJBs, WARS, and EARs
can use in a JBoss/Wildfly environment. See the JBoss/Wildfly documentation for more details on this file. It
allows you to pull in external dependencies among other fine grain actions.
Implementations of `UserStorageProviderFactory` are required to be plain java objects. But, we also currently support
implementing `UserStorageProvider` classes as Stateful EJBs. This is especially useful if you want to use JPA
to connect to a relational store. This is how you would do it:
[source,java]
----
@Stateful
@Local(EjbExampleUserStorageProvider.class)
public class EjbExampleUserStorageProvider implements UserStorageProvider,
UserLookupProvider,
UserRegistrationProvider,
UserQueryProvider,
CredentialInputUpdater,
CredentialInputValidator,
OnUserCache
{
@PersistenceContext
protected EntityManager em;
protected ComponentModel model;
protected KeycloakSession session;
public void setModel(ComponentModel model) {
this.model = model;
}
public void setSession(KeycloakSession session) {
this.session = session;
}
@Remove
@Override
public void close() {
}
...
}
----
You have to define the `@Local` annotation and specify your provider class there. If you don't do this, EJB will
not proxy the user correctly and your provider won't work.
You must put the `@Remove` annotation on the `close()` method of your provider. If you don't, the stateful bean
will never be cleaned up and you may eventually see error messages.
Implementations of `UserStorageProviderFactory` are required to be plain java objects. Your factory class would
perform a JNDI lookup of the Stateful EJB in its create() method.
[source,java]
----
public class EjbExampleUserStorageProviderFactory
implements UserStorageProviderFactory<EjbExampleUserStorageProvider> {
@Override
public EjbExampleUserStorageProvider create(KeycloakSession session, ComponentModel model) {
try {
InitialContext ctx = new InitialContext();
EjbExampleUserStorageProvider provider = (EjbExampleUserStorageProvider)ctx.lookup(
"java:global/user-storage-jpa-example/" + EjbExampleUserStorageProvider.class.getSimpleName());
provider.setModel(model);
provider.setSession(session);
return provider;
} catch (Exception e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
----

59
topics/user-storage/model-interfaces.adoc Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
=== Model Interfaces
Most of the methods defined in the _capability_ _interfaces_ either return or are passed in representations of a user. These representations are defined
by the `org.keycloak.models.UserModel` interface. App developers are required to implement this interface. It provides
a mapping between the external user store and the user metamodel that {{book.project.name}} uses.
[source,java]
----
package org.keycloak.models;
public interface UserModel extends RoleMapperModel {
String getId();
String getUsername();
void setUsername(String username);
String getFirstName();
void setFirstName(String firstName);
String getLastName();
void setLastName(String lastName);
String getEmail();
void setEmail(String email);
...
}
----
`UserModel` implementations provide access to read and update metadata about the user including things like username, name, email,
role and group mappings, as well as other arbitrary attributes.
There are other model classes within the `org.keycloak.models` package the represent other parts of the {{book.project.name}}
metamodel: `RealmModel`, `RoleModel`, `GroupModel`, and `ClientModel`.
==== Storage Ids
One really import method of `UserModel` is the `getId()` method. When implementing `UserModel` developers must be aware
of the user id format. The format must be
----
"f:" + component id + ":" + external id
----
The {{book.project.name}} runtime often has to lookup users by their user id. The user id contains enough information
so that the runtime does not have to query every single `UserStorageProvider` in the system to find the user.
The component id is the id returned from `ComponentModel.getId()`. The `ComponentModel` is passed in as a parameter
when creating the provider class so you can get it from there. The external id is information your provider class
needs to find the user in the external store. This is often a username or a uid. For example, it might look something
like this:
----
f:332a234e31234:wburke
----
When the runtime does a lookup by id, the id is parsed to obtain the component id. The component id is used to
locate the `UserStorageProvider` that was originally used to load the user. That provider is then passed the id.
The provider again parses the id to obtain the external id it will use to locate the user in external user storage.

17
topics/user-storage/packaging.adoc Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
=== Packaging and Deployment
User Storage providers are packaged in a jar and deployed or undeployed to the {{book.project.name}} runtime in the same exact
way as you would deploy something in the JBoss/Wildfly application server. You can either copy the jar directly to
the `deploy/` directory if the server, or use the JBoss CLI to execute the deployment. In order for {{book.project.name}}
to recognize the provider, there's one special file you need to add to the jar: `META-INF/services/org.keycloak.storage.UserStorageProviderFactory`.
This file must contain a line separated list of fully qualified classnames of use `UserStorageProviderFactory` implementation.
----
org.keycloak.examples.federation.properties.ClasspathPropertiesStorageFactory
org.keycloak.examples.federation.properties.FilePropertiesStorageFactory
----
{{book.project.name}} supports hot deployment of these provider jars. You'll also see later in this chapter that you can
package within and as Java EE components.

21
topics/user-storage/provider-capability-interfaces.adoc Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
=== Provider Capability Interfaces
If you've examined the `UserStorageProvider` interface closely you may be scratching your head a bit because it does
not define any methods for locating or managing users. These methods are actually defined in other _capability_
_interfaces_ depending on what scope of capabilities your external user store can provide and execute on. For example,
some external stores are read only and can only do simple queries and credential validation. You will only be required to implement the
_capability_ _interfaces_ for the features you are able to. Here's a list of interfaces that you can implement:
|===
|SPI|Description
|`org.keycloak.storage.user.UserLookupProvider`|This interface is required if you want to be able to login with users from this external store. Most (all?) providers implement this interface.
|`org.keycloak.storage.user.UserQueryProvider`|Defines complex queries that are used to locate one or more users. You must implement this interface if you want to view and manager users from the administration console.
|`org.keycloak.storage.user.UserRegistrationProvider`|Implement this interface if your provider supports adding and removing users.
|`org.keycloak.storage.user.UserBulkUpdateProvider`|Implement this interface if your provider supports bulk update of a set of users.
|`org.keycloak.credential.CredentialInputValidator`|Implement this interface if your provider can validate one or more different credential types. (i.e. can validate a password)
|`org.keycloak.credential.CredentialInputUpdater`|Implement this interface if your provider supports updating one more different credential types.
|===

117
topics/user-storage/provider-interfaces.adoc Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
=== Provider Interfaces
When building an implementation of the User Storage SPI you have to define a provider class and a provider factory.
Provider class instances are created per transaction by provider factories.
Provider classes do all the heavy lifting of user lookup and other user operations. They must implement the
`org.keycloak.storage.UserStorageProvider` interface.
[source,java]
----
package org.keycloak.storage;
public interface UserStorageProvider extends Provider {
/**
* Callback when a realm is removed. Implement this if, for example, you want to do some
* cleanup in your user storage when a realm is removed
*
* @param realm
*/
default
void preRemove(RealmModel realm) {
}
/**
* Callback when a group is removed. Allows you to do things like remove a user
* group mapping in your external store if appropriate
*
* @param realm
* @param group
*/
default
void preRemove(RealmModel realm, GroupModel group) {
}
/**
* Callback when a role is removed. Allows you to do things like remove a user
* role mapping in your external store if appropriate
* @param realm
* @param role
*/
default
void preRemove(RealmModel realm, RoleModel role) {
}
}
----
You may be thinking that the `UserStorageProvider` interface is pretty sparse? You'll see later in this chapter that
there are other mix-in interfaces your provider class may implement to support the meat of user integration.
`UserStorageProvider` instances are created once per transaction. When the transaction is complete, the
`UserStorageProvider.close()` method is invoked and the instance is then garbage collections. Instances are created
by provider factories. Provider factories implement the `org.keycloak.storage.UserStorageProviderFactory` interface.
[source,java]
----
package org.keycloak.storage;
/**
* @author <a href="mailto:bill@burkecentral.com">Bill Burke</a>
* @version $Revision: 1 $
*/
public interface UserStorageProviderFactory<T extends UserStorageProvider> extends ComponentFactory<T, UserStorageProvider> {
/**
* This is the name of the provider and will be showed in the admin console as an option.
*
* @return
*/
@Override
String getId();
/**
* called per Keycloak transaction.
*
* @param session
* @param model
* @return
*/
T create(KeycloakSession session, ComponentModel model);
...
}
----
Provider factory classses must specify the concrete provider class as a template parameter when implementing the
`UserStorageProviderFactory`. This is a must as the runtime will introspect this class to scan for its capabilities
(the other interfaces it implements). So for example, if your provider class is named `FileProvider`, then the
factory class should look like this:
[source,java]
----
public class FileProviderFactory implements UserStorageProviderFactory<FileProvider> {
public String getId() { return "file-provider"; }
public FileProvider create(KeycloakSession session, ComponentModel model) {
...
}
----
The `getId()` method returns the name of the User Storage provider. This id will be displayed in the admin console's
`UserFederation` page when you want to enable the provider for a specific realm.
The `create()` method is responsible for allocating an instance of the provider class. It takes a `org.keycloak.models.KeycloakSession`
parameter. This object can be used to lookup other information and metadata as well as provide access to various other
components within the runtime. The `ComponentModel` parameter represents how the provider was enabled and configured within
a specific realm. It contains the instance id of the enabled provider as well as any configuration you may have specified
for it when you enabled through the admin console.
The `UserStorageProviderFactory` has other capabilities as well which we will go over later in this chapter.

226
topics/user-storage/registration-query.adoc Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
=== Add/Remove User and Query Capability interfaces
One thing we have not done with our example is allow it to add and remove users or change passwords. Users defined in our example are
also not queryable or viewable in the admin console. To add these enhancements, our example provider must implement
the `UserQueryProvider` and `UserRegistrationProvider` interfaces.
==== Implementing UserRegistrationProvider
To implement adding and removing users from this particular store, we first have to be able to save our properties
file to disk.
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
[source,java]
----
public void save() {
String path = model.getConfig().getFirst("path");
path = EnvUtil.replace(path);
try {
FileOutputStream fos = new FileOutputStream(path);
properties.store(fos, "");
fos.close();
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new RuntimeException(e);
}
}
----
Then, the implementation of the `addUser()` and `removeUser()` methods becomes pretty simple.
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
[source,java]
----
public static final String UNSET_PASSWORD="#$!-UNSET-PASSWORD";
@Override
public UserModel addUser(RealmModel realm, String username) {
synchronized (properties) {
properties.setProperty(username, UNSET_PASSWORD);
save();
}
return createAdapter(realm, username);
}
@Override
public boolean removeUser(RealmModel realm, UserModel user) {
synchronized (properties) {
if (properties.remove(user.getUsername()) == null) return false;
save();
return true;
}
}
----
Notice that when adding a user we set the password value of the property map to be `UNSET_PASSWORD`. We do this as
we can't have null values for a property in the property value. We also have to modify the `CredentialInputValidator`
methods to reflect this.
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
[source,java]
----
@Override
public boolean isValid(RealmModel realm, UserModel user, CredentialInput input) {
if (!supportsCredentialType(input.getType()) || !(input instanceof UserCredentialModel)) return false;
UserCredentialModel cred = (UserCredentialModel)input;
String password = properties.getProperty(user.getUsername());
if (password == null || UNSET_PASSWORD.equals(password)) return false;
return password.equals(cred.getValue());
}
----
Since we can now save our property file, probably also makes sense to allow password updates.
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
[source,java]
----
@Override
public boolean updateCredential(RealmModel realm, UserModel user, CredentialInput input) {
if (!(input instanceof UserCredentialModel)) return false;
if (!input.getType().equals(CredentialModel.PASSWORD)) return false;
UserCredentialModel cred = (UserCredentialModel)input;
synchronized (properties) {
properties.setProperty(user.getUsername(), cred.getValue());
save();
}
return true;
}
----
We can now also implement disabling a password too.
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
[source,java]
----
@Override
public void disableCredentialType(RealmModel realm, UserModel user, String credentialType) {
if (!credentialType.equals(CredentialModel.PASSWORD)) return;
synchronized (properties) {
properties.setProperty(user.getUsername(), UNSET_PASSWORD);
save();
}
}
private static final Set<String> disableableTypes = new HashSet<>();
static {
disableableTypes.add(CredentialModel.PASSWORD);
}
@Override
public Set<String> getDisableableCredentialTypes(RealmModel realm, UserModel user) {
return disableableTypes;
}
----
With these methods implemented, you'll now be able to change and disable the password for the user in the admin console.
==== Implementing UserQueryProvider
Without implementing `UserQueryProvider` the admin console would not be able to view and manage users that were loaded
by our example provider. Let's look at implementing this interface.
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
[source,java]
----
@Override
public int getUsersCount(RealmModel realm) {
return properties.size();
}
@Override
public List<UserModel> getUsers(RealmModel realm) {
return getUsers(realm, 0, Integer.MAX_VALUE);
}
@Override
public List<UserModel> getUsers(RealmModel realm, int firstResult, int maxResults) {
List<UserModel> users = new LinkedList<>();
int i = 0;
for (Object obj : properties.keySet()) {
if (i++ < firstResult) continue;
String username = (String)obj;
UserModel user = getUserByUsername(username, realm);
users.add(user);
if (users.size() >= maxResults) break;
}
return users;
}
----
The `getUser()` method simple iterates the key set of the property file delegating to `getuserByUsername` to load a user.
Notice that we are indexing this call based on the `firstResult` and `maxResults` parameter. If your external store
doesn't support pagination, you'll have to do similar logic.
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
[source,java]
----
@Override
public List<UserModel> searchForUser(String search, RealmModel realm) {
return searchForUser(search, realm, 0, Integer.MAX_VALUE);
}
@Override
public List<UserModel> searchForUser(String search, RealmModel realm, int firstResult, int maxResults) {
List<UserModel> users = new LinkedList<>();
int i = 0;
for (Object obj : properties.keySet()) {
String username = (String)obj;
if (!username.contains(search)) continue;
if (i++ < firstResult) continue;
UserModel user = getUserByUsername(username, realm);
users.add(user);
if (users.size() >= maxResults) break;
}
return users;
}
----
The first declaration of `searchForUser()` takes a string paraeter. This is supposed to be a string that you use to
search username and email attributes to find the user. This string can be a substring which is why we use the `String.contains()`
method when doing our search.
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
[source,java]
----
@Override
public List<UserModel> searchForUser(Map<String, String> params, RealmModel realm) {
return searchForUser(params, realm, 0, Integer.MAX_VALUE);
}
@Override
public List<UserModel> searchForUser(Map<String, String> params, RealmModel realm, int firstResult, int maxResults) {
// only support searching by username
String usernameSearchString = params.get("username");
if (usernameSearchString == null) return Collections.EMPTY_LIST;
return searchForUser(usernameSearchString, realm, firstResult, maxResults);
}
----
The `searchForUser()` method that takes a `Map` parameter can search for a user based on first, last name, username, and email.
We only store usernames, so we only search based on usernames. We delegate to `searchForUser()` for this.
.PropertyFileUserStorageProvider
[source,java]
----
@Override
public List<UserModel> getGroupMembers(RealmModel realm, GroupModel group, int firstResult, int maxResults) {
return Collections.EMPTY_LIST;
}
@Override
public List<UserModel> getGroupMembers(RealmModel realm, GroupModel group) {
return Collections.EMPTY_LIST;
}
@Override
public List<UserModel> searchForUserByUserAttribute(String attrName, String attrValue, RealmModel realm) {
return Collections.EMPTY_LIST;
}
----
We don't store and groups or attributes, so the other methods just return an empty list.

326
topics/user-storage/simple-example.adoc Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,326 @@
=== Simple Read Only, Lookup Example
To illustrate the basics of implementing the User Storage SPI let's walk through a simple example. In this chapter
you'll see the implementation of a simple `UserStorageProvider` that looks up users in a simple property file. The
property file contains username and password definitions and is hardcoded to a specific location on the classpath.
The provider will be able to lookup the user by id, and username and also be able to validate passwords. Users that
originate from this provider will be read only.
==== Provider Class
The first thing we will walk through is the `UserStorageProvider` class.
[source,java]
----
public class PropertyFileUserStorageProvider implements
UserStorageProvider,
UserLookupProvider,
CredentialInputValidator,
CredentialInputUpdater
{
...
}
----
Our provider class, `PropertyFileUserStorageProvider`, implements a bunch of interfaces. It implements the
`UserStorageProvider` as that is a base requirement of the SPI. It implements the `UserLookupProvider` interface
because we want to be able to login with users stored by this provider. It implements the `CredentialInputValidator`
interface because we want to be able to validate passwords entered in via the login screen. Our property file
is going to be read only. We implement the `CredentialInputUpdater` because was want to post an error condition
when the user's password is attempted to be updated.
[source,java]
----
protected KeycloakSession session;
protected Properties properties;
protected ComponentModel model;
// map of loaded users in this transaction
protected Map<String, UserModel> loadedUsers = new HashMap<>();
public PropertyFileUserStorageProvider(KeycloakSession session, ComponentModel model, Properties properties) {
this.session = session;
this.model = model;
this.properties = properties;
}
----
The constructor for this provider class is going to store the reference to the `KeycloakSession`, `ComponentModel`, and
property file. We'll use all of these later. Also notice that there is a map of loaded users. Whenever we find a user
we will store it in this map so that we avoid recreating it again within the same transaction. This is a good practice
to do as many providers will need to do this (i.e. one that integrates with JPA). Remember also that provider class
instances are created once per transaction and are closed after the transaction completes.
===== UserLookupProvider implementation
[source,java]
----
@Override
public UserModel getUserByUsername(String username, RealmModel realm) {
UserModel adapter = loadedUsers.get(username);
if (adapter == null) {
String password = properties.getProperty(username);
if (password != null) {
adapter = createAdapter(realm, username);
loadedUsers.put(username, adapter);
}
}
return adapter;
}
protected UserModel createAdapter(RealmModel realm, String username) {
return new AbstractUserAdapter(session, realm, model) {
@Override
public String getUsername() {
return username;
}
};
}
@Override
public UserModel getUserById(String id, RealmModel realm) {
StorageId storageId = new StorageId(id);
String username = storageId.getExternalId();
return getUserByUsername(username, realm);
}
@Override
public UserModel getUserByEmail(String email, RealmModel realm) {
return null;
}
----
The `getUserByUsername()` method is invoked by the {{book.project.name}} login page when a user logs in. In our
implementation we first check the `loadedUsers` map to see if the user has already been loaded within this transaction.
If it hasn't been loaded we look in the property file for the username. If it exists we create an implementation
of `UserModel`, store it in `loadedUsers` for future reference and return this instance.
The `createAdapter()` method uses the helper class `org.keycloak.storage.adapter.AbstractUserAdapter`. This provides
a base implementation for `UserModel`. It automatically generates a user id based on the required storage id format
using the username of the user as the external id.
----
"f:" + component id + ":" + username
----
Every get method of `AbstractUserAdapter` either returns null or empty collections. However, methods that return
role and group mappings will return the default roles and groups configured for the realm for every user. Every set
method of `AbstractUserAdapter` will throw a `org.keycloak.storage.ReadOnlyException`. So if you attempt
to modify the user in the admin console you will get an error.
The `getUserById()` method parses the `id` parameter using the `org.keycloak.storage.StorageId' helper class. The
`StorageId.getExternalId()` method is invoked to obtain the username embeded in the `id` parameter. The method
then delegates to `getUserByUsername()`.
Emails are not stored at all, so the `getUserByEmail() method
===== CredentialInputValidator implementation
Next let's look at the method implementations for `CredentialInputValidator`.
[source,java]
----
@Override
public boolean isConfiguredFor(RealmModel realm, UserModel user, String credentialType) {
String password = properties.getProperty(user.getUsername());
return credentialType.equals(CredentialModel.PASSWORD) && password != null;
}
@Override
public boolean supportsCredentialType(String credentialType) {
return credentialType.equals(CredentialModel.PASSWORD);
}
@Override
public boolean isValid(RealmModel realm, UserModel user, CredentialInput input) {
if (!supportsCredentialType(input.getType()) || !(input instanceof UserCredentialModel)) return false;
UserCredentialModel cred = (UserCredentialModel)input;
String password = properties.getProperty(user.getUsername());
if (password == null) return false;
return password.equals(cred.getValue());
}
----
The `isConfiguredFor()` method is called by the runtime to determine if a specific credential type is configured for
the user. This method checks to see that the password is set for the user.
The `suportsCredentialType()` method returns whether validation is supported for a specific credential type. We check
to see if the credential type is `password`.
The `isValid()` method is responsible for validating passwords. The `CredentialInput` parameter is really just an abstract
interface for all credential types. We make sure that we support the credential type and also that it is an instance
of `UserCredentialModel`. When a user logs in through the login page, the plain text of the password input is put into
an instance of `UserCredentialModel`. The `isValid()` method checks this value against the plain text password stored
in the properties file. A return value of `true` means the password is valid.
===== CredentialInputUpdater implementation
As noted before, the only reason we implement the `CredentialInputUpdater` interface in this example is to forbid modifications of
user passwords. The reason we have to do this is because otherwise the runtime would allow the password to be overriden
in {{book.project.name}} local storage. We'll talk more about this later in this chapter
[source,java]
----
@Override
public boolean updateCredential(RealmModel realm, UserModel user, CredentialInput input) {
if (input.getType().equals(CredentialModel.PASSWORD)) throw new ReadOnlyException("user is read only for this update");
return false;
}
@Override
public void disableCredentialType(RealmModel realm, UserModel user, String credentialType) {
}
@Override
public Set<String> getDisableableCredentialTypes(RealmModel realm, UserModel user) {
return Collections.EMPTY_SET;
}
----
The `updateCredential()` method just checks to see if the credential type is password. If it is, a `ReadOnlyException`
is thrown.
==== Provider Factory implementation
Now that the provider class is complete, we now turn our attention to the provider factory class.
[source,java]
----
public class PropertyFileUserStorageProviderFactory
implements UserStorageProviderFactory<PropertyFileUserStorageProvider> {
public static final String PROVIDER_NAME = "readonly-property-file";
@Override
public String getId() {
return PROVIDER_NAME;
}
----
First thing to notice is that when implementing the `UserStorageProviderFactory` class, you must pass in the concrete
provider class implementation as a template parameter. Here we specify the provider class we defined before: `PropertyFileUserStorageProvider`.
WARNING: If you do not specify the template parameter, your provider will not function. The runtime does class introspection
to determine the _capability interfaces_ that the provider implements.
The `getId()` method identifies the factory in the runtime and will also be the string shown in the admin console when you want
to enable a user storage provider for the realm.
===== Initialization
[source,java]
----
private static final Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(PropertyFileUserStorageProviderFactory.class);
protected Properties properties = new Properties();
@Override
public void init(Config.Scope config) {
InputStream is = getClass().getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream("/users.properties");
if (is == null) {
logger.warn("Could not find users.properties in classpath");
} else {
try {
properties.load(is);
} catch (IOException ex) {
logger.error("Failed to load users.properties file", ex);
}
}
}
@Override
public PropertyFileUserStorageProvider create(KeycloakSession session, ComponentModel model) {
return new PropertyFileUserStorageProvider(session, model, properties);
}
----
The `UserStorageProviderFactory` interface has an optional `init()` method you can implement. When {{book.project.name}}
boots up, one and only one instance of each different provider factory. Also at boot time, the `init()` method will
be called on each one of these factory instances. There's also a `postInit()` method you can implement as well. After
each factory's `init()` method is invoked, their `postInit()` methods will be called.
In our `init()` method implementation, we find the property file containing our user declarations from the classpath.
We then load the `properties` field with the username and password combinations stored there.
The `Config.Scope` parameter is factory configuration that can be set up
within `standalone.xml`, `standalone-ha.xml`, or `domain.xml`.
See the link:{{book.installguide.link}}[{{book.installguide.name}}] for more details on
where the `standalone.xml`, `standalone-ha.xml`, or `domain.xml` file lives.
For example by adding the following to `standalone.xml`:
[source,xml]
----
<spi name="storage">
<provider name="readonly-property-file" enabled="true">
<properties>
<property name="path" value="/other-users.properties"/>
</properties>
</provider>
</spi>
----
We can specify the classpath of the user property file instead of hard coded it.
Then you can retrieve the config in the `PropertyFileUserStorageProviderFactory.init()` :
[source,java]
----
public void init(Config.Scope config) {
String path = config.get("path");
InputStream is = getClass().getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream(path);
...
}
----
===== Create method
Our last step in creating the provider factory is the `create()` method.
[source,java]
----
@Override
public PropertyFileUserStorageProvider create(KeycloakSession session, ComponentModel model) {
return new PropertyFileUserStorageProvider(session, model, properties);
}
----
We simply allocate the `PropertyFileUserStorageProvider` class. This create method will be called once per transaction.
==== Packaging and Deployment
The class files for our provider implementation should be placed in a jar. You also have to declare the provider
factory class within the `META-INF/services/org.keycloak.storage.UserStorageProviderFactory` file.
----
org.keycloak.examples.federation.properties.FilePropertiesStorageFactory
----
Once you create the jar you can deploy it using regular JBoss/Wildfly means: copy the jar into the `deploy/` directory
or using the JBoss CLI.
==== Enabling the Provider in Admin Console
You enable user storage providers per realm within the `User Federation` page in the admin console.
.User Federation
image:../../{{book.images}}/empty-user-federation-page.png[]
Select the provider we just created from the list: `readonly-property-file`. It brings you to the configuration
page for our provider. We don't have anything to configure, so just click the `Save` button.
.Configured Provider
image:../../{{book.images}}/storage-provider-created.png[]
When you go back to the main `User Federation` page, you'll now see your provider listed.
.User Federation
image:../../{{book.images}}/user-federation-page.png[]
You will now be able to login with a user declared in the `users.properties` file. Of course, this user will have
zero permissions to do anything and will be read only. You can though view the user on its account page after you
login.