Updating validation logic to match our expectations on what applicable should mean.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Jennings <pajennin@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
03db2e8b56
commit
551a3db987
2 changed files with 28 additions and 8 deletions
|
@ -122,11 +122,21 @@ public class DefaultClientType implements ClientType {
|
|||
ClientRepresentation newClient,
|
||||
String propertyName,
|
||||
ClientTypeRepresentation.PropertyConfig propertyConfig) {
|
||||
// Validate that read-only client properties were not changed.
|
||||
return propertyConfig.getApplicable() &&
|
||||
propertyConfig.getReadOnly() &&
|
||||
!Objects.isNull(getClientProperty(newClient, propertyName)) &&
|
||||
!Objects.equals(getClientProperty(oldClient, propertyName), getClientProperty(newClient, propertyName));
|
||||
Object newClientProperty = getClientProperty(newClient, propertyName);
|
||||
Object oldClientProperty = getClientProperty(oldClient, propertyName);
|
||||
|
||||
return (
|
||||
// Validate that non-applicable client properties were not changed.
|
||||
!propertyConfig.getApplicable() &&
|
||||
!Objects.isNull(newClientProperty) &&
|
||||
!Objects.equals(oldClientProperty, newClientProperty)
|
||||
) || (
|
||||
// Validate that applicable read-only client properties were not changed.
|
||||
propertyConfig.getApplicable() &&
|
||||
propertyConfig.getReadOnly() &&
|
||||
!Objects.isNull(newClientProperty) &&
|
||||
!Objects.equals(oldClientProperty, newClientProperty)
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void setClientProperty(ClientRepresentation client,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -121,13 +121,19 @@ public class ClientTypesTest extends AbstractTestRealmKeycloakTest {
|
|||
testRealm().clients().get(clientRep.getId()).update(clientRep);
|
||||
Assert.fail("Not expected to update client");
|
||||
} catch (BadRequestException bre) {
|
||||
// Expected
|
||||
assertErrorResponseContainsParams(bre.getResponse(), "serviceAccountsEnabled");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
clientRep.setServiceAccountsEnabled(true);
|
||||
|
||||
// Adding non-applicable attribute should not fail
|
||||
clientRep.getAttributes().put(ClientModel.LOGO_URI, "https://foo");
|
||||
try {
|
||||
testRealm().clients().get(clientRep.getId()).update(clientRep);
|
||||
Assert.fail("Not expected to update client");
|
||||
} catch (BadRequestException bre) {
|
||||
assertErrorResponseContainsParams(bre.getResponse(), "logoUri");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Update of supported attribute should be successful
|
||||
clientRep.getAttributes().remove(ClientModel.LOGO_URI);
|
||||
|
@ -138,18 +144,22 @@ public class ClientTypesTest extends AbstractTestRealmKeycloakTest {
|
|||
@Test
|
||||
public void testCreateClientFailsWithMultipleInvalidClientTypeOverrides() {
|
||||
ClientRepresentation clientRep = ClientBuilder.create()
|
||||
.clientId("invalid-client-type-fields-set")
|
||||
.clientId("service-account-client-type-required-to-be-confidential-and-service-accounts-enabled")
|
||||
.type(ClientTypeManager.SERVICE_ACCOUNT)
|
||||
.serviceAccountsEnabled(false)
|
||||
.publicClient()
|
||||
.build();
|
||||
|
||||
Response response = testRealm().clients().create(clientRep);
|
||||
assertErrorResponseContainsParams(response, "publicClient", "serviceAccountsEnabled");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void assertErrorResponseContainsParams(Response response, String... items) {
|
||||
assertEquals(Response.Status.BAD_REQUEST, response.getStatusInfo());
|
||||
ErrorRepresentation errorRepresentation = response.readEntity(ErrorRepresentation.class);
|
||||
assertThat(
|
||||
List.of(errorRepresentation.getParams()),
|
||||
containsInAnyOrder("publicClient", "serviceAccountsEnabled"));
|
||||
containsInAnyOrder(items));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue